Rudolph v. Whitehurst

565 So. 2d 190, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 485, 1990 WL 116409
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1990
Docket89-834
StatusPublished

This text of 565 So. 2d 190 (Rudolph v. Whitehurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudolph v. Whitehurst, 565 So. 2d 190, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 485, 1990 WL 116409 (Ala. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of dismissal of the plaintiffs cause of action for failure to state a claim, as provided by Rule 12(b)(6), A.R. Civ.P., is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, HOUSTON and KENNEDY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
565 So. 2d 190, 1990 Ala. LEXIS 485, 1990 WL 116409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-whitehurst-ala-1990.