Rudolph v. State

256 So. 3d 220
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2018·No. Case No. 5D18-326·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tray Charles Rudolph appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief which raised twelve grounds for relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. We reverse the summary denial of the first ground for relief and remand for the postconviction court to either attach sufficient records to support a summary denial or to hold an evidentiary hearing. See Hird v. State, 204 So.3d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016) (citing Burgos v. State, 181 So.3d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ). We affirm the summary denial of the remaining grounds. We note that review of grounds three through twelve has been waived. See Braddy v. State, 219 So.3d 803, 825 (Fla. 2017) (citing Duest v. Dugger, 555 So.2d 849, 852 (Fla. 1990) ).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part, REMANDED.

PALMER, TORPY and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudolph v. State, 256 So. 3d 220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

256 So. 3d 220 (Rudolph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duest v. Dugger
555 So. 2d 849 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Jabari M. Hird v. State
204 So. 3d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Burgos v. State
181 So. 3d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)