Rudolph v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Rudolph v. State

121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 26, 1929

Docket6 Div. 438.

StatusPublished

This text of 121 So. 925 (Rudolph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudolph v. State, 121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The two appellants were tried jointly, and were convicted under an indictment which charged burglary and grand larceny. From the judgment of conviction, they jointly appealed to this court, their appeal being rested upon the record only. The record is regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction, from which the appeal was taken, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The two appellants were tried jointly, and were convicted under an indictment which charged burglary and grand larceny. From the judgment of conviction, they jointly appealed to this court, their appeal being rested upon the record only. The record is regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction, from which the appeal was taken, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-state-alactapp-1929.