Rudolph v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Rudolph v. State

121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1929·No. 6 Div. 438.·Published

Opinion

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The two appellants were tried jointly, and were convicted under an indictment which charged burglary and grand larceny. From the judgment of conviction, they jointly appealed to this court, their appeal being rested upon the record only. The record is regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction, from which the appeal was taken, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRIOKEN, P. J.

The two appellants were tried jointly, and were convicted under an indictment which charged burglary and grand larceny. From the judgment of conviction, they jointly appealed to this court, their appeal being rested upon the record only. The record is regular and without error. Let the judgment of conviction, from which the appeal was taken, stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Rudolph v. State, 121 So. 925, 23 Ala. App. 672 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

121 So. 925 (Rudolph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.