Rudolph v. North

6 Dakota 79

Opinion

By the Court :

The judgment is reversed upon the ground that the verdict is neither general nor special. It should have been z-ejected by the court, and the jury again sent out to deliberate. The objection of respondent to its reception should have been sustained.

The special finding in the verdict in favor of the respondent was not sufficient in law to sustain the judgment.

That an inspection of the record shows a mis-trial of the cause, and a new trial is ordered.

All of the justices concur.