Rudolph v. North

Supreme Court of Dakota

Rudolph v. North

6 Dakota 79

CourtSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota

DecidedMay 15, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Dakota 79 (Rudolph v. North) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudolph v. North, 6 Dakota 79 (dakotasup 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court :

The judgment is reversed upon the ground that the verdict is neither general nor special. It should have been z-ejected by the court, and the jury again sent out to deliberate. The objection of respondent to its reception should have been sustained.

The special finding in the verdict in favor of the respondent was not sufficient in law to sustain the judgment.

That an inspection of the record shows a mis-trial of the cause, and a new trial is ordered.

All of the justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court :

The judgment is reversed upon the ground that the verdict is neither general nor special. It should have been z-ejected by the court, and the jury again sent out to deliberate. The objection of respondent to its reception should have been sustained.

The special finding in the verdict in favor of the respondent was not sufficient in law to sustain the judgment.

That an inspection of the record shows a mis-trial of the cause, and a new trial is ordered.

All of the justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Dakota 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-north-dakotasup-1888.