Rudolph v. Corrigan

City of New York Municipal Court

Rudolph v. Corrigan

67 N.Y.S. 1145

DecidedJanuary 10, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.Y.S. 1145 (Rudolph v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudolph v. Corrigan, 67 N.Y.S. 1145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is wholly unwarranted by the evidence, and must for that reason be reversed. Even if the court believed the plaintiff’s improbable story that the defendant gave him general authority to go ahead and do whatever repairs he deemed necessary, still he does not show either the amount of work which he claims to have done, or its value, with sufficient decision to justify a judgment for any appreciable sum; much less, for the large sum awarded him by the justice. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is wholly unwarranted by the evidence, and must for that reason be reversed. Even if the court believed the plaintiff’s improbable story that the defendant gave him general authority to go ahead and do whatever repairs he deemed necessary, still he does not show either the amount of work which he claims to have done, or its value, with sufficient decision to justify a judgment for any appreciable sum; much less, for the large sum awarded him by the justice. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.Y.S. 1145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-corrigan-nynyccityct-1901.