Rudolph v. Corrigan

33 Misc. 776
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 776 (Rudolph v. Corrigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudolph v. Corrigan, 33 Misc. 776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is wholly unwarranted by the evidence and must for that reason be reversed. Even if the court believed the plaintiff’s improbable story that the defendant gave him general authority to go ahead and do whatever repairs he deemed necessary, still he does not show either the amount of work which he claims to have done, or its value, with sufficient decision to justify a judgment,for any appreciable sum, much less for the large sum awarded" him by the justice.

Present: Tbuax, P. J., Scott and Dugbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-corrigan-nyappterm-1901.