Rudolph v. City of New York
This text of 259 A.D. 724 (Rudolph v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action for damages for injuries suffered by an infant plaintiff by reason of a fall on a sidewalk, resulting [725]*725from his coming in contact with a wire fence which enclosed a hedge. Companion action by his guardian ad litem for loss of services and expenses. Judgment for the defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —■ Lazanskyj P. J-, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.D. 724, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1940.