Rudolph v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rudolph v. City of New York

259 A.D. 724, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1940·Published

Opinion

Action for damages for injuries suffered by an infant plaintiff by reason of a fall on a sidewalk, resulting [725]*725from his coming in contact with a wire fence which enclosed a hedge. Companion action by his guardian ad litem for loss of services and expenses. Judgment for the defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —■ Lazanskyj P. J-, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for damages for injuries suffered by an infant plaintiff by reason of a fall on a sidewalk, resulting [725]*725from his coming in contact with a wire fence which enclosed a hedge. Companion action by his guardian ad litem for loss of services and expenses. Judgment for the defendants unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present —■ Lazanskyj P. J-, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Rudolph v. City of New York, 259 A.D. 724, 18 N.Y.S.2d 1012, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 724 (Rudolph v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.