Rudolph Jones, Jr. v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation

204 F.3d 680, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18274, 1999 WL 1482025
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 29, 1999·No. 97-5917·Published

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous’ opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4, 1999. Reargument is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, December 8,1999.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudolph Jones, Jr. v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation, 204 F.3d 680, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18274, 1999 WL 1482025 (6th Cir. 1999).

204 F.3d 680 (Rudolph Jones, Jr. v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related