Rudolph Jones, Jr. v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation
This text of 204 F.3d 680 (Rudolph Jones, Jr. v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous’ opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4, 1999. Reargument is tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, December 8,1999.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 F.3d 680, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18274, 1999 WL 1482025, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-jones-jr-v-city-of-lakeland-tennessee-a-tennessee-municipal-ca6-1999.