Rudolph Hudson v. James A. Rhodes

579 F.2d 46
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 31, 1978
Docket77-3019
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 579 F.2d 46 (Rudolph Hudson v. James A. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudolph Hudson v. James A. Rhodes, 579 F.2d 46 (6th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Three male inmates of Ohio prisons and two women engaged to marry inmates filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin enforcement of an unwritten policy of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections which forbids the marriage of incarcerated persons. District Judge Don J. Young dismissed the action and plaintiffs appeal.

We affirm on authority of Johnson v. Rockefeller, 365 F.Supp. 377 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d sub nom. (without opinion) Butler v. Wilson, Governor of New York, 415 U.S. 953, 94 S.Ct. 1479, 39 L.Ed.2d 569 (1974); see also Polmaskitch v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 527 (W.D.Okl.1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ronald Bradbury v. Louie L. Wainwright
718 F.2d 1538 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)
Bradbury v. Wainwright
538 F. Supp. 377 (M.D. Florida, 1982)
Wool v. Hogan
505 F. Supp. 928 (D. Vermont, 1981)
Department of Corrections v. Roseman
390 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Salisbury v. List
501 F. Supp. 105 (D. Nevada, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
579 F.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-hudson-v-james-a-rhodes-ca6-1978.