Rudolph Hudson v. James A. Rhodes
This text of 579 F.2d 46 (Rudolph Hudson v. James A. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Three male inmates of Ohio prisons and two women engaged to marry inmates filed this suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 seeking to enjoin enforcement of an unwritten policy of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections which forbids the marriage of incarcerated persons. District Judge Don J. Young dismissed the action and plaintiffs appeal.
We affirm on authority of Johnson v. Rockefeller, 365 F.Supp. 377 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d sub nom. (without opinion) Butler v. Wilson, Governor of New York, 415 U.S. 953, 94 S.Ct. 1479, 39 L.Ed.2d 569 (1974); see also Polmaskitch v. United States, 436 F.Supp. 527 (W.D.Okl.1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 F.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-hudson-v-james-a-rhodes-ca6-1978.