Rudolph Andrews v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 1, 2016
Docket15-4088
StatusPublished

This text of Rudolph Andrews v. State of Florida (Rudolph Andrews v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudolph Andrews v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

RUDOLPH ANDREWS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-4088

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Rudolph Andrews, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rudolph Andrews v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudolph-andrews-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.