Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp.
This text of 247 N.E.2d 698 (Rudnicki v. Hearst Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this action of tort each of the three defendants demurred to the declaration, and each demurrer was sustained. The plaintiff demurred to the answers filed by each defendant and these demurrers were overruled. The plaintiff moved for judgment against all the defendants and this motion was denied. From these orders the plaintiff appealed. The order denying the motion for [801]*801judgment was not appealable. Wishnewsky v. Saugus, 325 Mass. 191, 192.
There was no error.
Orders sustaining defendants’ demurrers affirmed.
Orders overruling plaintiff’s demurrers affirmed.
Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for judgment dismissed.
Judgments for defendants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 N.E.2d 698, 355 Mass. 800, 1969 Mass. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudnicki-v-hearst-corp-mass-1969.