Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rudnick v. Federal Trust Bank

Rudnick v. Federal Trust Bank

125 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 3834056, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 26, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-4032
StatusPublished

This text of 125 So. 3d 1045 (Rudnick v. Federal Trust Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudnick v. Federal Trust Bank, 125 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 3834056, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Roy v. Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County, 455 So.2d 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Rudnick to seek relief from [1046]*1046the trial court pursuant to his previously-filed Motion for Relief from Judgment.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Consideration of Rudnick’s Motion for Relief from Judgment.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roy v. Barnett Bank of Palm Beach County
455 So. 2d 496 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 So. 3d 1045, 2013 WL 3834056, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudnick-v-federal-trust-bank-fladistctapp-2013.