Rudnick v. Dorris

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rudnick v. Dorris

196 So. 2d 504, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5052

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 22, 1967

DocketNo. 7262

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 504 (Rudnick v. Dorris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudnick v. Dorris, 196 So. 2d 504, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5052 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the appellee, plaintiff below. We have carefully studied the points on appeal, briefs submitted by both parties and examined the record-on-appeal. We hold that the judgment was entered upon a verdict returned by the jury under appropriate and correct instructions by the trial court. The appellant not having shown reversible error, the final judgment is affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict for the appellee, plaintiff below. We have carefully studied the points on appeal, briefs submitted by both parties and examined the record-on-appeal. We hold that the judgment was entered upon a verdict returned by the jury under appropriate and correct instructions by the trial court. The appellant not having shown reversible error, the final judgment is affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 So. 2d 504, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudnick-v-dorris-fladistctapp-1967.