Rudnick
This text of 203 N.E.2d 391 (Rudnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exception to-the dismissal of the petition overruled. This petition to establish the truth of exceptions pursuant to G-. L. c. 231, § 117 (as amended through St. 1960, c. 207, § 4), was dismissed by a single justice, he “being satisfied that there is no merit to the bill of exceptions, if proved.” The petitioner excepted to the dismissal of the petition. No error appears. “While as a general rule no inquiry into the merits of a bill of exceptions is open upon a petition to establish them, the petition may be dismissed if it is obvious that, there is nothing in the exceptions if proved.” Scano, petitioner, 338 Mass. 7,8.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
203 N.E.2d 391, 348 Mass. 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudnick-mass-1964.