Home/New York Court of Appeals/Rudmann v. Scaringe

Rudmann v. Scaringe

427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 778, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2685
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 3, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 427 N.E.2d 507 (Rudmann v. Scaringe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudmann v. Scaringe, 427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 778, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2685 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

[780]*780OPINION OF THE COURT

On the appeal by Patricia H. Hennessey and James J. Hennessey: Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.

On the appeal by the Board of Elections: Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the Board of Elections is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Korniczky v. Sunderland
175 Misc. 2d 912 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Gelb v. Board of Elections in the City of New York
950 F. Supp. 82 (S.D. New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 778, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudmann-v-scaringe-ny-1981.