Rudison v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance
This text of 153 So. 2d 883 (Rudison v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In re: Hules (Hulis) Rudison applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 152 So.2d 407.
Writ refused. While it appears that the Court of Appeal made an incorrect statement of the law with respect to burden of proof shifting to plaintiff, it further appears that on the facts found by said Court the result is correct.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 So. 2d 883, 244 La. 669, 1963 La. LEXIS 2447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudison-v-michigan-millers-mutual-insurance-la-1963.