Rudisill v. Tyler

169 So. 614, 125 Fla. 154, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1246
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 So. 614 (Rudisill v. Tyler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudisill v. Tyler, 169 So. 614, 125 Fla. 154, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1246 (Fla. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. See Tyler v. Rudisill, 114 Fla. 801, 155 Sou. 353.

The opinion adopted by this Court, supra, became the law of the case. The court below applied the law as stated in that opinion in the subsequent proceedings in the court below and judgment was' rendered accordingly.

*155 It follows that the judgment be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Higbee v. Housing Authority of Jacksonville
197 So. 479 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 614, 125 Fla. 154, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudisill-v-tyler-fla-1936.