Rudisill v. Tyler

169 So. 614, 125 Fla. 154, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1246
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 3, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This is the second appearance of this case in this Court. See Tyler v. Rudisill, 114 Fla. 801, 155 Sou. 353.

The opinion adopted by this Court, supra, became the law of the case. The court below applied the law as stated in that opinion in the subsequent proceedings in the court below and judgment was' rendered accordingly.

*155 It follows that the judgment be affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed

Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, C. J., and Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudisill v. Tyler, 169 So. 614, 125 Fla. 154, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1246 (Fla. 1936).

169 So. 614 (Rudisill v. Tyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Higbee v. Housing Authority of Jacksonville
197 So. 479 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)