Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rudisill v. Handley

Rudisill v. Handley

72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 789, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 328
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 30, 1911
Docket3064
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 72 S.E. 189 (Rudisill v. Handley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudisill v. Handley, 72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 789, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 328 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Eussell, J.

This case comes as a sequel to the case of Citizens Bank v. Rudisill, 4 Ga. App. 37 (60 S. E. 818), where most of the facts essential to an understanding of the present case are set forth. There it was held that Eudisill had no right of -action against the bank, and it was intimated that he might have one against Handley. The headnote shows that we now hold what we then intimated. Handley stands in a very different relation to the transaction from what the bank did. He ought not to keep the stock without paying for it, and Eudisill is the one he ought to pay.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. South Side Atlanta Bank
102 S.E.2d 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Stein Steel & Supply Co. v. K. & L. Enterprises, Inc.
102 S.E.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Reid v. Hemphill
61 S.E.2d 201 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Morgan v. Hutcheson
7 S.E.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Dobbs v. Perlman
2 S.E.2d 109 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Wagener v. United States Nat. Bank
127 P. 778 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 189, 9 Ga. App. 789, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudisill-v-handley-gactapp-1911.