Rudisell v. State
557 So. 2d 226, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1990 WL 17482
Opinion
We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 [227]*227(Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (1986).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rudisell v. State, 557 So. 2d 226, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1990 WL 17482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 226 (Rudisell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Streeter v. State
416 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
McKee v. State
450 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Johnson v. State
478 So. 2d 885 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
White v. State
446 So. 2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
McIntosh v. State
211 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)