Rudisell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rudisell v. State

557 So. 2d 226, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1990 WL 17482

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 1990

DocketNo. 89-155

StatusPublished

This text of 557 So. 2d 226 (Rudisell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudisell v. State, 557 So. 2d 226, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1990 WL 17482 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 [227]*227(Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude that there is no inconsistency of verdicts. See McKee v. State, 450 So.2d 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Streeter v. State, 416 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); McIntosh v. State, 211 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); see also § 806.03(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). There was no error in the denial of the motion for judgment of acquittal. White v. State, 446 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla.1984); Johnson v. State, 478 So.2d 885 [227]*227(Fla. 3d DCA 1985), appeal dismissed, 488 So.2d 830 (1986).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 So. 2d 226, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1197, 1990 WL 17482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudisell-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack