Rudis v. Zoning Commission
This text of 65 A.2d 579 (Rudis v. Zoning Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs sought a declaratory judgment determining that the 1500-foot limitation relating to liquor outlets contained in the Fairfield zoning regulations is illegal and void, and affirmative relief. The Superior Court rendered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
The single issue is essentially the same as the first one considered in Miller v. Zoning Commission, reported immediately before the present case, and is governed by the decision in that case and by State ex rel. Wise v. Turkington, 135 Conn. 276, 63 A. 2d 596.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 A.2d 579, 135 Conn. 410, 1949 Conn. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudis-v-zoning-commission-conn-1949.