Rudis Chicas-Sanchez v. William Barr

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 14, 2020
• Docket: 19-1688
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1688

RUDIS ONAN CHICAS-SANCHEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: January 2, 2020 Decided: January 14, 2020

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christina A. Wilkes, WILKES LEGAL, LLC, Takoma Park, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, David J. Schor, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Rudis Onan Chicas-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion for

reconsideration and reopening. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and conclude that

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See Urbina v. Holder, 745

F.3d 736, 741 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the

petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED