Rudiger v. Coleman

129 A.D. 916, 114 N.Y.S. 689
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 129 A.D. 916 (Rudiger v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudiger v. Coleman, 129 A.D. 916, 114 N.Y.S. 689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Gaynor, J.;

The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted to us a large volume of 361 pages which is called a brief. It is not a brief, and does not servé the purpose of elucidating and aiding which is done by a brief. It has in addition an index of 12 pages, which is about the length the brief would have been if made after the way established for the making of briefs. The case is a simple one, was tried with care and true discernment by the learned trial Judge, and as the opinion he filed leaves nothing additional to be said on the law or the facts, the judgment should be affirmed thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breuchaud v. Rudiger
162 A.D. 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Rudiger v. Coleman
115 N.Y.S. 1143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D. 916, 114 N.Y.S. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudiger-v-coleman-nyappdiv-1908.