Rudiger v. Coleman
This text of 129 A.D. 916 (Rudiger v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The learned counsel for the appellants has submitted to us a large volume of 361 pages which is called a brief. It is not a brief, and does not servé the purpose of elucidating and aiding which is done by a brief. It has in addition an index of 12 pages, which is about the length the brief would have been if made after the way established for the making of briefs. The case is a simple one, was tried with care and true discernment by the learned trial Judge, and as the opinion he filed leaves nothing additional to be said on the law or the facts, the judgment should be affirmed thereon.
For opinion see N. Y. Sup. Ct. Cases & Briefs of Counsel (State Law Library), Vol. 7138, No. 1, p. 746 et seq.— [Rep.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D. 916, 114 N.Y.S. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudiger-v-coleman-nyappdiv-1908.