Rudiger v. . Coleman

New York Court of Appeals

Rudiger v. . Coleman

122 N.E. 877, 225 N.Y. 662, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1191

DecidedJanuary 14, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 122 N.E. 877 (Rudiger v. . Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudiger v. . Coleman, 122 N.E. 877, 225 N.Y. 662, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1191 (N.Y. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think that the judgment entered upon the report of the referee as modified and affirmed by the Appellate Division is appealable to this court and, therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal- is denied. *663 This determination, however, should not be regarded as indicating that we think that the appellants can bring up for review on said appeal all of the intermediate orders specified in their notice. Apparently such notice indicates an intent to ask this court to review practically all of the proceedings which have ever been taken in this long litigation, and it is perfectly manifest that some of the orders are discretionary while others cannot be regarded as necessarily affecting the final judgment now before us for review, and, therefore, they cannot be considered on this appeal.

The motion should be denied, without costs.

All concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think that the judgment entered upon the report of the referee as modified and affirmed by the Appellate Division is appealable to this court and, therefore, the motion to dismiss the appeal- is denied. *663 This determination, however, should not be regarded as indicating that we think that the appellants can bring up for review on said appeal all of the intermediate orders specified in their notice. Apparently such notice indicates an intent to ask this court to review practically all of the proceedings which have ever been taken in this long litigation, and it is perfectly manifest that some of the orders are discretionary while others cannot be regarded as necessarily affecting the final judgment now before us for review, and, therefore, they cannot be considered on this appeal.

The motion should be denied, without costs.

All concur.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 N.E. 877, 225 N.Y. 662, 1919 N.Y. LEXIS 1191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudiger-v-coleman-ny-1919.