Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Rudich v. Kia

Rudich v. Kia

199 A.D.2d 374, 608 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12383
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 374 (Rudich v. Kia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudich v. Kia, 199 A.D.2d 374, 608 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant Ali M. Kas, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Shaw, J.), dated June 26, 1991.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Shaw at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., Balletta, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 A.D.2d 374, 608 N.Y.S.2d 82, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudich-v-kia-nyappdiv-1993.