Rudge v. Latopolski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rudge v. Latopolski

57 A.D.3d 964, 869 N.Y.2d 803

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We agree with the appellant’s contention that the respondent William John Rudge failed to establish his entitlement to an award of monetary damages upon his cause of action alleging trespass. Accordingly, the respondent was entitled to an award of $1 as nominal damages (see Ligo v Gerould, 244 AD2d 852 [1997]).

The evidence adduced by the appellant at trial failed to establish undue influence.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We agree with the appellant’s contention that the respondent William John Rudge failed to establish his entitlement to an award of monetary damages upon his cause of action alleging trespass. Accordingly, the respondent was entitled to an award of $1 as nominal damages (see Ligo v Gerould, 244 AD2d 852 [1997]).

The evidence adduced by the appellant at trial failed to establish undue influence.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Eng and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Rudge v. Latopolski, 57 A.D.3d 964, 869 N.Y.2d 803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

57 A.D.3d 964 (Rudge v. Latopolski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related