Ruddy v. Newark Electric Light & Power Co.
46 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 357, 34 Vroom 357, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 83
This text of 46 A. 1100 (Ruddy v. Newark Electric Light & Power Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ruddy v. Newark Electric Light & Power Co., 46 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 357, 34 Vroom 357, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 83 (N.J. 1899).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given by that court.
For affirmances — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Van Syckel, Adams, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenburgh. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mares v. New Mexico Public Service Co.
82 P.2d 257 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1938)
Diller v. Northern California Power Co.
123 P. 359 (California Supreme Court, 1912)
Aument v. Pennsylvania Telephone Co.
28 Pa. Super. 610 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1905)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
46 A. 1100, 63 N.J.L. 357, 34 Vroom 357, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruddy-v-newark-electric-light-power-co-nj-1899.