Ruddy v. Dock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ruddy v. Dock

199 A.D. 939

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1921·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed, 'with ten dollars costs and disbursements (See People ex rel. Mulligan v. Collis, 8 App. Div. 618), upon the ground that, while those papers were mistakenly inserted in the appeal record upon the other appeal, and have no proper place therein, the court at Special Term had no power to make an order striking them out, as that matter belongs solely to this court. Moreover, even a motion here to strike them out formally is unnecessary in this case, as this court will, upon the hearing and consideration of the main appeal, consider only the papers recited in the order there appealed from. Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, 'with ten dollars costs and disbursements (See People ex rel. Mulligan v. Collis, 8 App. Div. 618), upon the ground that, while those papers were mistakenly inserted in the appeal record upon the other appeal, and have no proper place therein, the court at Special Term had no power to make an order striking them out, as that matter belongs solely to this court. Moreover, even a motion here to strike them out formally is unnecessary in this case, as this court will, upon the hearing and consideration of the main appeal, consider only the papers recited in the order there appealed from. Blaekmar, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Ruddy v. Dock, 199 A.D. 939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

199 A.D. 939 (Ruddy v. Dock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related