Ruddick v. Florida State Prison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ruddick v. Florida State Prison

149 So. 3d 1155, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17123, 2014 WL 5334026

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 21, 2014

DocketNo. 1D14-3371

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 1155 (Ruddick v. Florida State Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ruddick v. Florida State Prison, 149 So. 3d 1155, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17123, 2014 WL 5334026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because jurisdiction of this court was not invoked within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). To the extent appellant seeks to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court to obtain a writ of habeas corpus, the petition is properly filed in the circuit court. See, e.g., Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Fla.1999) (writ petitions that could require resolution of disputed issues of fact should be handled by the circuit courts).

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a final order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because jurisdiction of this court was not invoked within thirty days of rendition of the order to be reviewed, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). To the extent appellant seeks to invoke the original jurisdiction of this court to obtain a writ of habeas corpus, the petition is properly filed in the circuit court. See, e.g., Harvard v. Singletary, 733 So.2d 1020, 1022 (Fla.1999) (writ petitions that could require resolution of disputed issues of fact should be handled by the circuit courts).

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 3d 1155, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17123, 2014 WL 5334026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruddick-v-florida-state-prison-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack