Rudderow v. Phila.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rudderow v. Phila.

31 A. 53, 166 Pa. 241, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1184

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 21, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 378·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The facts of this case are clearly set forth in the report of the learned referee, and all that need be said as to the law applicable thereto will be found in his opinion. There is nothing in the case that requires further comment. There was no error in dismissing the exceptions and entering judgment for the damages found in favor of the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed on the clear and convincing opinion of the referee..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The facts of this case are clearly set forth in the report of the learned referee, and all that need be said as to the law applicable thereto will be found in his opinion. There is nothing in the case that requires further comment. There was no error in dismissing the exceptions and entering judgment for the damages found in favor of the appellee.

The judgment is affirmed on the clear and convincing opinion of the referee..

Rudderow v. Phila., 31 A. 53, 166 Pa. 241, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1184 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

31 A. 53 (Rudderow v. Phila.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related