Rudderow v. Dudley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rudderow v. Dudley

41 N.J. Eq. 611

DecidedJune 15, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.J. Eq. 611 (Rudderow v. Dudley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudderow v. Dudley, 41 N.J. Eq. 611 (N.J. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was announced by

Parker, J.

In this case there was a sale of land under partition proceedings. The notice of sale was not legal. The purchaser paid the purchase-money.

The order of the chancellor, refusing the rule to show cause why the sale should not be set aside, should be set aside, on condition that the purchaser be placed in the same condition as before sale by repayment of the purchase-money, with interest, within twenty days.

Order wnanimously reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was announced by

Parker, J.

In this case there was a sale of land under partition proceedings. The notice of sale was not legal. The purchaser paid the purchase-money.

The order of the chancellor, refusing the rule to show cause why the sale should not be set aside, should be set aside, on condition that the purchaser be placed in the same condition as before sale by repayment of the purchase-money, with interest, within twenty days.

Order wnanimously reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.J. Eq. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudderow-v-dudley-nj-1886.