Rudd v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Rudd v. State

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 132, 1929 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 16

Court of Claims of Illinois·Decided February 13, 1929·No. No. 1131·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim to recover damages on account of building of hard road by the State Highway Department of the State of Illinois, adjacent to the City of Joliet.

Evidence was heard and arguments made and the Attorney General comes and consents to an allowance of Twenty-seven Hundred Dollars ($2,700.00) as compensation to claimant.

Therefore, it is recommended by this court that the claimant be allowed the sum of Twenty-seven Hundred Dollars ($2,700.00).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim to recover damages on account of building of hard road by the State Highway Department of the State of Illinois, adjacent to the City of Joliet.

Evidence was heard and arguments made and the Attorney General comes and consents to an allowance of Twenty-seven Hundred Dollars ($2,700.00) as compensation to claimant.

Therefore, it is recommended by this court that the claimant be allowed the sum of Twenty-seven Hundred Dollars ($2,700.00).

Rudd v. State, 6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 132, 1929 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 16 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

6 Ill. Ct. Cl. 132 (Rudd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.