Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rudd v. State

Rudd v. State

971 So. 2d 903, 2007 WL 4269042
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 2007·No. 5D07-3469·Published

Opinion

971 So.2d 903 (2007)

Dean RUDD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D07-3469.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 7, 2007.
Rehearing Denied January 9, 2008.

Dean A. Rudd, Raiford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Rudd appeals the summary denial of his Rule 3.800(a)[1] motion in which he alleged that he was entitled to additional jail-time credit. The trial court denied the motion without attaching any portion of the record to refute Rudd's facially sufficient claim. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach portions of the record refuting Rudd's claim or to grant the requested relief. Friss v. State, 881 So.2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MONACO, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rudd v. State, 971 So. 2d 903, 2007 WL 4269042 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

971 So. 2d 903 (Rudd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friss v. State
881 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)