Rudd v. State
858 So. 2d 346, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2003 WL 22432823
This text of 858 So. 2d 346 (Rudd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rudd v. State, 858 So. 2d 346, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2003 WL 22432823 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
858 So. 2d 346, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16115, 2003 WL 22432823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudd-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.