Rudd v. Redfern

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rudd v. Redfern

789 So. 2d 416, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8071, 2001 WL 649690

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 2001

DocketNo. 3D01-1135

StatusPublished

This text of 789 So. 2d 416 (Rudd v. Redfern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rudd v. Redfern, 789 So. 2d 416, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8071, 2001 WL 649690 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders which properly resolve preliminary disputes in what promises to be an acrimonious and lengthy dissolution and custody battle. In affirming we do not overlook the appellant’s contentions relating to denial of due process. Assuming the appellant’s due process rights were violated, these were temporary intrusions which were corrected by a subsequently noticed hearing, or waived by the appellant’s acquiescence.

Affirmed.

LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s orders which properly resolve preliminary disputes in what promises to be an acrimonious and lengthy dissolution and custody battle. In affirming we do not overlook the appellant’s contentions relating to denial of due process. Assuming the appellant’s due process rights were violated, these were temporary intrusions which were corrected by a subsequently noticed hearing, or waived by the appellant’s acquiescence.

Affirmed.

LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 So. 2d 416, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8071, 2001 WL 649690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudd-v-redfern-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack