Rudd v. City of Fort Pierce

209 So. 2d 467, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1968
DocketNo. 1659
StatusPublished

This text of 209 So. 2d 467 (Rudd v. City of Fort Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rudd v. City of Fort Pierce, 209 So. 2d 467, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was an officer on the police force of the City of Fort Pierce. He contends that, under Rule VIII, Section 49 and Rule IX, Section 61 of the Fort Pierce Civil Service Personnel Rules and Regulations, he was entitled to permanent status as a Captain. The City disagrees and insists that Rule VIII, Section 54 governs. Reading, construing and comparing the sections 'in pari materia, we agree with the City’s position and the comprehensive and cogent opinion of the trial court which is the basis of this appeal.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, C. J., REED, J., and MUR-PHREE, JOHN A. H., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 So. 2d 467, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rudd-v-city-of-fort-pierce-fladistctapp-1968.