Ruckman v. Astor

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 20, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 483
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ruckman v. Astor. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Paige Ch. 517
New York Court of Chancery·Decided April 5, 1842·Published

Opinion

The chancellor decided in this case that the purchaser of mortgaged premises which are redeemed within the time limited by the act of 1837, is not entitled to the rents and profits received by him intermediate the sale and the time of redemption, in addition to his purchase money and ten per cent interest thereon; where the owner of the equity of redemption has neglected to give security to prevent such purchaser from taking possession.

That a sale or assignment of an equity redemption necessarily carries with it the right to an account for the rents and profits of the mortgaged premises, as an incident to the right of redemption.

Decree appealed from reversed and demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruckman v. Astor, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 20, 1842 N.Y. LEXIS 483 (N.Y. 1842).

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 20 (Ruckman v. Astor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.