Rucker v. Tatlow
251 U.S. 537, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1813
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Joseph G. Waters and Mr. Joseph M. Stark for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lee Monroe for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rucker v. Tatlow, 251 U.S. 537, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1813 (1919).
251 U.S. 537 (Rucker v. Tatlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
238 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)