Rucker v. Tatlow
251 U.S. 537, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1813
This text of 251 U.S. 537 (Rucker v. Tatlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rucker v. Tatlow, 251 U.S. 537, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1813 (1919).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Joseph G. Waters and Mr. Joseph M. Stark for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lee Monroe for defendant in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Brolan v. United States
236 U.S. 216 (Supreme Court, 1915)
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
238 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
251 U.S. 537, 40 S. Ct. 55, 64 L. Ed. 402, 1919 U.S. LEXIS 1813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rucker-v-tatlow-scotus-1919.