Rucker v. State

184 S.E.2d 228, 124 Ga. App. 491, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 985
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 30, 1971·No. 46758·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The motion for supersedeas is based upon the overruling of a motion for change of venue under Code §27-1201 of the Code of Georgia, as amended. The procedures for appeal in this Code section have been superseded by the provisions of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, as amended in 1968. Code Ann. Ch. 6-9. (See also Code Ann. § 6-904).

Therefore, the overruling of the motion for change of venue is an interlocutory order which is not an appealable judgment absent a certificate of review authorized by the Appellate Practice Act. *492 It is ordered that the said motion for supersedeas be hereby

Decided September 30, 1971. Smith & Brooks, Theodore E. Smith, for movant.

Denied.

Bell, C. J., Jordan, P. J., and Hall, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rucker v. State, 184 S.E.2d 228, 124 Ga. App. 491, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 985 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

184 S.E.2d 228 (Rucker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. State
193 S.E.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
McCurley v. State
190 S.E.2d 631 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)