Rucker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rucker v. State

65 S.E. 1068, 7 Ga. App. 47, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 527

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 9, 1909

Docket2163

StatusPublished

This text of 65 S.E. 1068 (Rucker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rucker v. State, 65 S.E. 1068, 7 Ga. App. 47, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 527 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Hiel, O. J.

1. Tlie first ground of tlie amended motion for a new trial is not verified by tlie trial court, and therefore will not be considered.

2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial because of the alleged newly discovered testimony, the testimony being both cumulative and impeaching.

3. No error appears, and the verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hiel, O. J.

1. Tlie first ground of tlie amended motion for a new trial is not verified by tlie trial court, and therefore will not be considered.

2. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial because of the alleged newly discovered testimony, the testimony being both cumulative and impeaching.

3. No error appears, and the verdict is supported by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 S.E. 1068, 7 Ga. App. 47, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rucker-v-state-gactapp-1909.