Rucker v. John Deere Consumer Products, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedNovember 13, 2001
DocketI.C. NO. 823435
StatusPublished

This text of Rucker v. John Deere Consumer Products, Inc. (Rucker v. John Deere Consumer Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rucker v. John Deere Consumer Products, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Opinion

The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Young, the records contained in the Commission's file in this matter and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence in this matter. Having reconsidered the evidence of record, the Full Commission modifies and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's award of benefits and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant-employer at all relevant times herein.

3. The carrier on the risk was John Deere Insurance Company at all times relevant herein.

4. The parties stipulated that the date of the plaintiff's accident/occupational disease was May 7, 1997.

5. The parties stipulated that the defendants accepted the plaintiff's claim to her right hand and arm as compensable.

6. The parties stipulated that the plaintiff's average weekly wage was $485.76, yielding a compensation rate of $323.52 at all relevant times herein.

7. The parties stipulated to the plaintiff's medical records from Carolina Healthcare Associates, Southeastern Plastic Surgery/Hand Center, Gaston Orthopaedic Clinic, Rehability Center, Miller Orthopaedic Clinic, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Rehabilitative Medicine Associates of the Carolinas, Piedmont Physical Therapy and Hand Center and Concentra Managed Care, Inc.

8. The issue presented is:

a) Whether the plaintiff is entitled to additional workers' compensation benefits under the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act as a result of her May 7, 1997 accident/occupational disease contracted during her employment with the defendant-employer?

***********
Based upon all the evidence of record and the reasonable inferences therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following additional:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff was 46 years old. Plaintiff completed her GED in May 1999. Plaintiff is right hand dominant and is currently unemployed.

2. Plaintiff began employment with the defendant-employer on or about October 30, 1995, where she worked on the assembly line installing carburetors on blowers. Plaintiff had to lift these items on and off the line and use a handgun. Plaintiff testified that she had to lift up to ten pounds about 600 times per night. Plaintiff also testified that in performing her job she had to use both hands for all tasks.

3. On or about May 7, 1997, plaintiff began to experience pain in her right hand and arm as a result of using the handgun. The defendants accepted plaintiff's claim to her right hand as compensable.

4. Prior to May 7, 1997, plaintiff had a ganglion cyst on her left wrist in 1994. Plaintiff had three surgeries for this condition and completely recovered.

5. Plaintiff presented to Dr. Pushpa Chander and Dr. Brian Wall on May 16, 1997 complaining of right thumb pain, wrist pain and sharp pains to her arm. On May 19, 1997, plaintiff presented to Dr. Benson Timmons, who diagnosed plaintiff with a sprain or ligament tear in her right wrist. Plaintiff was referred to Dr. Eric Emerson, a plastic surgeon with extra training in hand surgery, who eventually diagnosed plaintiff with carpal tunnel syndrome on her right hand.

6. On December 19, 1997, Dr. Emerson performed a right carpal tunnel syndrome release on plaintiff's right hand and on December 31, 1997, Dr. Emerson released plaintiff to return to work on light duty with no lifting more than five pounds. Plaintiff returned to work earning the same or greater average weekly wage.

7. On March 13, 1998, Dr. Emerson released plaintiff to return to regular duty work on a graduated schedule, but after one week, plaintiff returned to Dr. Emerson complaining of pain in her right thumb. Dr. Emerson recommended left hand only duty for approximately one week and then light duty and referred plaintiff to Dr. Chris Covington, who specializes in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

8. Dr. Covington diagnosed plaintiff with right arm pain with complications of myofascial pain syndrome, and later a diffuse pain problem in arms, trunk and legs.

9. Plaintiff continued to experience pain in her right wrist up to her elbows, shoulder and neck and also pain in her left wrist and elbow, and numbness in her left hand.

10. On December 1, 1998, Dr. Emerson performed a right trigger thumb release on plaintiff's right hand and released plaintiff to return to one-handed (left hand) light duty work.

11. On May 28, 1999, plaintiff was on her sub-assembly job with the defendant-employer, when she and her entire shift were laid off.

12. Plaintiff has permanent work restrictions of no lifting more than ten pounds, no push, pull or tugging more than ten pounds of resistance and self-paced with limited repetitive movement. Plaintiff continues to have pain in both her left and right hands and arms and she has trouble sleeping.

13. Plaintiff sought employment after being laid off by the defendant-employer, but only "line jobs" were available and her restrictions prohibited her from performing these jobs. Plaintiff also sought employment with eight different employers, including, but not limited to, HR Block, Plastic Products, Inc. and Jean's Textiles. None of these employers was hiring new employees.

14. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff was enrolled at Gaston College working towards her accounting degree. Since on or about July 10, 1999, plaintiff has received $220.00 per week in unemployment benefits.

15. Dr. Emerson released plaintiff at maximum medical improvement on February 18, 1999 and assigned a permanent partial disability rating of 8% to her right hand.

16. On June 9, 1999, plaintiff presented to Dr. Forney Hutchinson, an orthopedist, for a second opinion. Dr. Hutchinson noted that plaintiff had persistent mild symptoms of degenerative arthritis in her right wrist, lateral epicondylitis in her right elbow, and that she was probably developing carpal tunnel syndrome in her left wrist. Dr. Hutchinson felt that treatment of the medial and lateral epicondylitis was warranted, as well as evaluation and management of what appears to be developing carpal tunnel syndrome in her left wrist. He noted that she might need a carpal tunnel release for her left wrist. He also notes that patient asks about relation of left hand and right elbow complaints to job and states, "Since I have not seen her in one and one-half years, I have no opinion as to whether those complaints are related. I would defer determination to Dr. Emerson." Dr. Hutchinson assigned a 3% permanent partial disability rating to her right hand as a result of the carpal tunnel and subsequent surgery. He also said that she may have an additional disability in terms of her elbow and contra lateral hand, but again deferred to Dr. Emerson on this.

17. Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(9)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-42.1
North Carolina § 97-42.1
§ 97-53
North Carolina § 97-53(13)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rucker v. John Deere Consumer Products, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rucker-v-john-deere-consumer-products-inc-ncworkcompcom-2001.