Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.

205 N.E.2d 878, 15 N.Y.2d 852, 257 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1619
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 11, 1965·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the motion for reargument herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon an alleged question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Plaintiff contended that the dismissal of her complaint by this court deprived her of a jury trial as guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, therefore, constituted a denial of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held there was no violation of any constitutional rights. [See 15 N Y 2d 516.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 205 N.E.2d 878, 15 N.Y.2d 852, 257 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1619 (N.Y. 1965).

205 N.E.2d 878 (Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. New York City Transit Authority
108 A.D.3d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)