Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.
This text of 205 N.E.2d 878 (Rucker v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied.
Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the motion for reargument herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon an alleged question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Plaintiff contended that the dismissal of her complaint by this court deprived her of a jury trial as guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, therefore, constituted a denial of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held there was no violation of any constitutional rights. [See 15 N Y 2d 516.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 N.E.2d 878, 15 N.Y.2d 852, 257 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rucker-v-fifth-avenue-coach-lines-inc-ny-1965.