Ruchell Magee v. Louis F. Nelson, Warden

400 F.2d 393
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 1968
Docket22250_1
StatusPublished

This text of 400 F.2d 393 (Ruchell Magee v. Louis F. Nelson, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruchell Magee v. Louis F. Nelson, Warden, 400 F.2d 393 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

This appeal, on motion of appellant, was severed from that in Gilmore v. California, No. 22,052A/F, in which our opinion has today been filed. The appeal is taken from the same order as was the Gilmore appeal — an order denying a motion for the convening of a three-judge court. Appellant in severing his appeal, has apparently done so in order to dissociate himself from the single issue which, in Gilmore, we found', to support three-judge-court jurisdiction,, and to confine his claim to what in Gilmore we described as “certain present practices allegedly followed at [the California State Penitentiary at] San Quentin which are not state-wide in application and not properly the subject of three-judge-court jurisdiction.”

Accordingly, as to appellant Magee the order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lester v. Jurgensen Company
400 F.2d 393 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 F.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruchell-magee-v-louis-f-nelson-warden-ca9-1968.