Ruch v. Jones

33 Mo. 393
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 33 Mo. 393 (Ruch v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruch v. Jones, 33 Mo. 393 (Mo. 1863).

Opinion

Dryden, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The case hardly presents the point the parties wish decid[394]*394ed, which is, whether the joint answer of several co-defendants is not sufficiently verified by the affidavit of one of them. We have no hesitation in answering the question in the affirmative. (Huntington & wife v. House, 22 Mo. 365.)

If the verification had been insufficient, still it was wrong to render judgment by default so long as the answer was on the record. The right practice in such case is to move to strike out the imperfectly verified answer, and after it is thus disposed of, then take the default; but as long as the answer stands, no matter whether imperfectly verified or not verified at all, it is error to enter a default. The affidavit is no part of the answer.

Let the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. Mason
105 So. 404 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Lawler v. Bashford-Burmister Co.
46 P. 72 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1896)
Halsey v. Meinrath
54 Mo. App. 335 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Howland v. Reeves
25 Mo. App. 458 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)
Smith v. Bateman
79 Ill. 531 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Mo. 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruch-v-jones-mo-1863.