Ruby Williams v. State
This text of Ruby Williams v. State (Ruby Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RUBY WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-238
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 9, 2017
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Scott C. Dupont, Judge.
Ruby Williams, Bonifay, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Ruby Williams (“Appellant”) appeals the order summarily denying Appellant’s
motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.800(a). The trial court did not attach pertinent portions of the record to support its
conclusion. Therefore, we reverse and remand to the trial court to attach portions of the
record supporting its summary denial of Appellant’s motion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., and SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruby Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruby-williams-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.