Ruby Williams v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 5, 2017
Docket5D17-238
StatusPublished

This text of Ruby Williams v. State (Ruby Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruby Williams v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RUBY WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-238

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 9, 2017

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Scott C. Dupont, Judge.

Ruby Williams, Bonifay, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ruby Williams (“Appellant”) appeals the order summarily denying Appellant’s

motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.800(a). The trial court did not attach pertinent portions of the record to support its

conclusion. Therefore, we reverse and remand to the trial court to attach portions of the

record supporting its summary denial of Appellant’s motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., and SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ruby Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruby-williams-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.