Ruby v. Ryan

594 F. App'x 198
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 3, 2015·No. No. 14-2140·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helen E. Ryan and Mykal S. Ryan seek to appeal the district court’s order directing them to show cause why their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s orders should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Ryans seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court .and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruby v. Ryan, 594 F. App'x 198 (4th Cir. 2015).

594 F. App'x 198 (Ruby v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)