Ruby v. Railroad Co.

8 W. Va. 269, 1875 W. Va. LEXIS 12
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 1, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 8 W. Va. 269 (Ruby v. Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruby v. Railroad Co., 8 W. Va. 269, 1875 W. Va. LEXIS 12 (W. Va. 1875).

Opinion

PAULU JüDGE:

qqle plaintiff in this case brings an action of assump-sit against the defendant, the Railroad Company, for a balance due to plaintiffs intestate of $330 as by an account filed with his declaration, which consists of the common counts. . The defendant demurred to the declaration, and to each count thereof; there being joinder in the demurrer the court overruled the same. It • was maintained that the money count, which simply alleged that the defendant was indebted to the plaintiff’s intestate in the sum of $330 for money then and there paid by the plaintiff’s intestate, at its request, without further alleging that it was for the plaintiff’s use, was fatally defective. As no recovery under the proofs in the cause could be had upon this count, but only upon the one for money had and received, the question is not one now fairly arising here for decision. The defendant filed the pleas of non-assumpsit and payment. The court proceeding in lieu of a jury to try the case, upon hearing the evidence and arguments of counsel, found for the plaintiff and assessed his damages at $350.74, and rendered judgment against defendant for this amount, interest and costs. The defendant tendered a bill of exceptions, which is found in the record. Upon looking into the record we find that the whole controversy turns, mainly, under the evidence, upon the sufficiency of the following receipt, to-wit:

“Received, Charleston, August 6, 1872,of Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad Company, through hands of H. T. Douglass, D. E., $604.27, in full payment of all sums due the estate of B. A. Goode on account of moneys collected for board of men as per statement of division engineer hereto attached.
JOHN C. Ruby,
Curator estate of B. A. Goode.”,

And that the statements accompanying said receipt, [271]*271and delivered to the plaintiff by the said' Douglass, .gineer as aforesaid, was in the words and figures following, to wit:

“ Statement of moneys collected by C. and O. R. R. Co. for estate of B. A. Goode, on account of board of men for the month of June, 1872:
OvjqQYzgfdH11IMcBlZqT1oHPy

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago Art Co. v. Thacker
63 S.E. 770 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1909)
Anderson v. Davis
47 S.E. 157 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1904)
Radcliff v. High
2 Va. 271 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1843)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 W. Va. 269, 1875 W. Va. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruby-v-railroad-co-wva-1875.