Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC D/B/A Jack in the Box
This text of Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC D/B/A Jack in the Box (Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC D/B/A Jack in the Box) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00363-CV
Ruby Lucille Hall § From the 141st District Court
§ of Tarrant County (141-256462-11) v. § February 20, 2014 RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the Box § Opinion by Justice Meier
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that
there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the
trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further
proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is further ordered that Appellee RDSL Enterprises LLC d/b/a Jack in the
Box shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By /s/ Bill Meier_______________________
Justice Bill Meier
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ruby Lucille Hall v. RDSL Enterprises LLC D/B/A Jack in the Box, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruby-lucille-hall-v-rdsl-enterprises-llc-dba-jack--texapp-2014.