Ruby

189 Ct. Cl. 573, 1969 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 104, 1969 WL 2977
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 26, 1969
DocketNo. 324-69
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 Ct. Cl. 573 (Ruby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ruby, 189 Ct. Cl. 573, 1969 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 104, 1969 WL 2977 (cc 1969).

Opinion

Military gay; active duty gay; res judicata; limitation of actions. — Plaintiff, a former enlisted man in the Navy, was released with an undesirable discharge on December 15, 1931. He claims the discharge was invalid and seeks active duty pay. On May 17, 1965, plaintiff filed a petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, No. 43638, in which he made the same allegations as those in the petition in this court. The District Court on June 17, 1965, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss, and on August 3, 1965, an order was entered dismissing the action. On June 2, 1966, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied plaintiff’s appeal, 365 F. 2d 385, and on December 19, 1966, the same circuit denied plaintiff’s appeal, 369 F. 2d 404, certiorari also being denied, 386 U.S. 1011 (1967). The case comes before this [574]*574court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument, the court concludes that plaintiff’s alleged claim is barred under the doctrine of res judicata and by the statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2501, citing Kirk v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 738 (1964). On November 26, 1969, the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ruby
194 Ct. Cl. 1023 (Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 Ct. Cl. 573, 1969 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 104, 1969 WL 2977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ruby-cc-1969.