Ruby & Associates Pc v. George W Smith & Company Pc

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 2012·No. 144349·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

144349 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra, RUBY & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and DAVID I. Justices RUBY, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ Respondents-Appellees, v SC: 144349 COA: 297266 Oakland CC: 2003-054535-NM GEORGE W. SMITH & COMPANY, P.C., GEORGE W. SMITH, and JOYCE W. MILLER, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, and

THE GILES LAW FIRM, Petitioner-Appellant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 24, 2012 _________________________________________ h0917 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruby & Associates Pc v. George W Smith & Company Pc, (Mich. 2012).

Ruby & Associates Pc v. George W Smith & Company Pc (Ruby & Associates Pc v. George W Smith & Company Pc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.