Rubsamen v. Schultz
12 F.2d 1018, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3457
This text of 12 F.2d 1018 (Rubsamen v. Schultz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rubsamen v. Schultz, 12 F.2d 1018, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3457 (2d Cir. 1926).
Opinion
Ordered that, except as to the proceeds of the sales of real estate situated without the Southern district of New York, the decree be affirmed. The method of [1019]*1019modifying the decree in accordance with this direction is left to the lower court. No costs of this court are allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 F.2d 1018, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rubsamen-v-schultz-ca2-1926.